Jump to content

MrDK

In Memorium
  • Posts

    128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

MrDK's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

179

Reputation

  1. No it does not. As I clearly posted, I side with Glasseye. To those who it cut out in cardboard and bend in neon lights. I am 100% PRO a rewrite of the second amend, however, I am realistic and understand the process. That appears to be something that some will not or cannot understand, where those "some" want to live in a dream world. Your post demonstrate perfect that you are oblivious to the process clearly in article five of the constitution. As for San Francisco, the city is interfering with the federal government. DHS if the agency that determine whether a group is a terrorist group. That means there is NO light. The light you see is as good as flying pigs. Keep dreaming, it obviously makes you happy and call me what you like. I will call you ignorant on this topic.
  2. What light do you see? A city council pretending for be Depart of Homeland Security? This one will not fly and is a political attention grabber at best. DHS will be fighting it.
  3. What else can the president do? For starters I share your view in this regard, but I also respect the constitution. If one of the amends is ignored others can be as well. In that case we can soon own "one", eliminate freedom of expression, forget about a speedy trail, etc. If all states' legislative assemblies are by popular vote then in theory, then as little as 2.48% can decide whether. More realistic with states that will favor a change removed and going further down the list, in which case 3.23% can decide. Skin the cat any way possible, the second amendment will not change in our life time.
  4. Did you strive for a high grade in the subject "Putting Words in Peoples Mouths" NOWHERE did I state that it was Obozo's fault, NOWHERE.
  5. I know ... 27 times. This proves my point that it can be done the way the constitution spell it out The second amendment should take the same path. Many still think that congress and/or the president can make the changes. Obozo too was full of "thoughts and prayers". He had NO power.
  6. Is that a real question? I have lived near 90% of my adult life here and should be ashamed if I was not concerned, I moved for a reason. Perhaps you should ask that question of people who has never been here or not spent any appreciable time here, but have countless advice for the US despite the fact the do not understand the law which they advise against. For heaven sake it is a short read. SO DO ask the may that have no interest in the US why they are so concerned!!! I hope I have made it understood why I am concered.
  7. I am not sure who you are advising. It is obvious you have not read article V of the US constitution. If you did you will soon find that from the bottom 15 of states by population only 2 are likely to ratify a change. In other words 1.08% of the population is enough to block a change, equal to 75% of the several states
  8. Why do you guys not come up with a solution as to how to change the Constitution , rather than just "pissing on it" there is a written procedure as to how to change the Constitution within the Constitution itself.
  9. Either I did not express myself well or you misunderstood. We both can agree on the shock and horror aspect of every such even, hence I made no comment addressing the event itself. Like you I (presumably) am on the same wavelength as most Americans as well as most outside USA. NO, I do NOT find any killing amusing. I do find the (thinking) indebt knowledge of the constitution amusing and this is where "right to bear arms" is written. You mention Trump and congress and I said there is NOTHING they can do in rewriting the constitution, which is well documented in article V of the very document. It is a state matter. Don't get side tracked in thinking it is a matter of a vote in congress or something where the president has a voice, Again I was NOT laughing about this event not any other and also I mentioned that I personally am in favor of gun control. I hope I expressed myself a little better this time.
  10. I always find interesting, if not amusing, when laws pertaining to the US constitution bring to the front people from outside the US suggesting "just change the law". Headcount means nothing, electoral college means nothing and a president cannot sign an amendment in to law and not can he veto it. How about a super majority in both legislative branches in the federal government (or by state convention) to even bring a constitutional amendment or repeal on the table. The federal government cannot repeal, change of amend the constitution. I takes 75% of the several states to ratify any change... again no headcount. It certainly is possible to change the constitution, it is even possible to change it to headcount on a ballot for people to vote on is all it takes. It is all outlined in article 5 of the constitution as to how it can be done. SIMPLE! PS: I am pro gun control BTW: it is heading the wrong direction.
  11. Beef Tatar for lunch. 10 oz. (~300g) extra lean ground beef
  12. I can teach you Denglish, however, it is easier if you start with a throat infection. Denglish is often referred to by Brits as a throat disorder. If you prefer the version however, you need not go have an infection of any kind you just need to get underwater and start speaking.
  13. saw a bumper sticker some time ago: "Dyslexics Against Drugs ... Just say 'ON'"
  14. Just ask a Brit how many languages he speaks. 555
×
×
  • Create New...