Jump to content

The Derek Chauvin George Floyd Murder Trial.


Kathmandu

Recommended Posts

No one expected Chauvin to testify because that would have left him open to a devastating cross examination by the prosecution.  He had little or nothing to win.  His only hope- and it's a tiny one- is that one or two jurors have reasonable doubt about his guilt.

Rioting will probably break out whatever the outcome of the trial, but it would be far worse if there were a hung jury and mistrial.  It would be hell for breakfast all across the U.S. if he were found not guilty, but I can't see that happening by any stretch of the imagination.  The prosecution had an extremely strong case the defense couldn't refute.

Evil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting analysis.  I agree that it was not a surprise that the defendant did not testify.  
 

One never knows how a jury will think or react.  Will they evaluate the evidence, will they be intimidated by the whole situation, or have they already decided.  No one knows.  
 

Two concerns from me; firstly in my opinion media reporting has been biased.  One example was that one reporter was awaiting the verdict and sentence.  Not exactly unbiased.  The media have been too ready, in my opinion to link this incident to other incidents, which they should not have done.  
 

Secondly the jury have been allowed home at the end of each days business.  Whatever instructions they are given, it will take a mighty strong jury to reach a decision purely based on the evidence in court.  How many of the jurors know about the carbon monoxide test result which was disclosed too late by the prosecution team?  The prosecution must prove all elements of the charge; the defence merely have to raise reasonable doubt as far as one necessary element in each charge.  Do the jury realise that?

Finally Mr Nelson has a style which is brief and concise; he will speak after the prosecution and prior to the judge.  His summing up and how it is perceived will be vital for the case.  Potential own goal for the prosecution team is that they make any reference to the carbon monoxide test result and mistrial is declared.


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Gary said:

That cop is toast. The libs want him hung in the public square and sentencing may create riots when they think it is not severe enough.

Just hope a conviction doesn't cause all the T'cult Capitol seditionists (who are still out of jail) to rally 'round the flag pole and take over some state courthouses. They're the USA's biggest danger to the legal system and the police.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2021 at 4:45 AM, lazarus said:

Just hope an conviction  acquittal doesn't cause all the T'cult Capitol seditionists   BLMers (who are still out of jail) to rally 'round the flag pole and  take over some state courthouses. They're the USA's biggest danger to the legal system and the police.

Since this was the most ignorant and idiotic post in this thread, I had to fix it for you.

Auntie Maxine had to open up her big yap and very well give the defense an opening for an appeal if there is a guilty verdict for her insurrectionist language. Even the damn judge got pissed off about her incendiary remarks and the potential fallout they could result in regarding the trial.

Cops all over the country, especially in blue state big cities, are on stand by. This could get ugly and the MSM stands at the ready and would like nothing more than for riots, violence, looting, burning and destruction to happen in America if the wrong verdict is announced.

Edited by Mr. Smooth
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ "Since this was the most ignorant and idiotic post in this thread,..."

Thank you Mr. Smooth for your insight on US history. You must have missed the news on January 6, 2021 -- mainstream or otherwise - when 1000s of white nationalist Americans attacked the US Capitol on the urging of the then US president trying to overthrow the results of the election. Many law enforcement officers were injured and several eventually died.

Let's hope that they don't decide to act violently once again if white former police officer Chauvin is convicted of murdering a handcuffed black man.

 

600525c396c91.image.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Nightcrawler said:

Now, now boys, remember that this is the General section of the forum. 😊

Read back in the posts. There's been a lot of dancing around the real issues.

This is the realty of what is happening according the the US government Department of Homeland Security:

White supremacists, extremists may use Chauvin trial to further their agendas: DHS

https://abcnews.go.com/US/white-supremacists-extremists-chauvin-trial-agendas-dhs/story?id=76949365

 

Edited by lazarus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Nightcrawler said:

This thread was recently moved from "advanced" to "General" section about a week ago I think in case anyone was not aware of that 

After the verdict...
Needs to be moved over to US politics -- whether some board members like it or not -- because it's about to explode...anyway the verdict goes:

White supremacists, extremists may use Chauvin trial to further their agendas: DHS

https://abcnews.go.com/US/white-supremacists-extremists-chauvin-trial-agendas-dhs/story?id=76949365

"...In an intelligence briefing obtained by ABC News, DHS (US Department of Homeland Security) analysts warn that domestic extremists -- including anarchists and white supremacists -- "may attempt to exploit activities and events surrounding the legal proceeding" and "violence could occur with little or no warning."

. . .

'Anticipation and anxiety': Derek Chauvin trial highlights America's racial divide after George Floyd's death

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/03/10/derek-chauvin-trial-highlights-america-racial-divides/6880041002/

...“This trial is one of the first major ones after the summer’s uprisings, so while in the past such outcomes haven’t been in our favor, we’re now watching carefully to see if the legal system might be reforming due to pressure,” said Melina Abdullah, co-founder of Black Lives Matter Los Angeles and a professor of Pan-African Studies at California State University-Los Angeles.

Abdullah recalled the trial that followed the beating of Rodney King by a group of Los Angeles police officers in 1991, in which an all-white jury assembled in a courthouse in a white suburb absolved the officers of responsibility, sparking days of deadly rioting. King’s beating also was caught on videotape.

“We’re here now on the 30th anniversary of that King beating, and what the criminal justice and political system told us then was ‘Don’t believe your lying eyes,’” Abdullah said. “So, we’d love to see justice come now for George Floyd, but we’re not under any illusion. We’ll continue to push for meaningful justice reform.”...

 

Edited by lazarus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, lazarus said:

After the verdict...
Needs to be moved over to US politics -- whether some board members like it or not -- because it's about to explode...anyway the verdict goes:

White supremacists, extremists may use Chauvin trial to further their agendas: DHS

https://abcnews.go.com/US/white-supremacists-extremists-chauvin-trial-agendas-dhs/story?id=76949365

"...In an intelligence briefing obtained by ABC News, DHS (US Department of Homeland Security) analysts warn that domestic extremists -- including anarchists and white supremacists -- "may attempt to exploit activities and events surrounding the legal proceeding" and "violence could occur with little or no warning."

. . .

'Anticipation and anxiety': Derek Chauvin trial highlights America's racial divide after George Floyd's death

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/03/10/derek-chauvin-trial-highlights-america-racial-divides/6880041002/

...“This trial is one of the first major ones after the summer’s uprisings, so while in the past such outcomes haven’t been in our favor, we’re now watching carefully to see if the legal system might be reforming due to pressure,” said Melina Abdullah, co-founder of Black Lives Matter Los Angeles and a professor of Pan-African Studies at California State University-Los Angeles.

Abdullah recalled the trial that followed the beating of Rodney King by a group of Los Angeles police officers in 1991, in which an all-white jury assembled in a courthouse in a white suburb absolved the officers of responsibility, sparking days of deadly rioting. King’s beating also was caught on videotape.

“We’re here now on the 30th anniversary of that King beating, and what the criminal justice and political system told us then was ‘Don’t believe your lying eyes,’” Abdullah said. “So, we’d love to see justice come now for George Floyd, but we’re not under any illusion. We’ll continue to push for meaningful justice reform.”...

 

There is now a topic open in the Politics Club (US Politics) . But I shall leave this open for general discussion and updates on the trial. That should satisfy everyone for the time being 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lazarus said:

^ "Since this was the most ignorant and idiotic post in this thread,..."

Thank you Mr. Smooth for your insight on US history. You must have missed the news on January 6, 2021 -- mainstream or otherwise - when 1000s of white nationalist Americans attacked the US Capitol on the urging of the then US president trying to overthrow the results of the election. Many law enforcement officers were injured and several eventually died.

Let's hope that they don't decide to act violently once again if white former police officer Chauvin is convicted of murdering a handcuffed black man.

 

600525c396c91.image.jpg

yawn

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...